The ten tenses, side by side
4 · Verbs — how the system works · a plain-language guide to Assyrian (Sureth) grammar
Your verb book prints ten forms for every verb, and this is where they come from and what each is for. Take patekh "to open," 3ms throughout. Read the middle column as the recipe — every one of them is one of the two stems plus something you already know.
| form | built from | English | when you reach for it |
|---|---|---|---|
| patekh | present stem + S | he opens / he'll open | the all-purpose present; also "(that) he open" after another verb |
| ki-patekh | ki- + present | he opens (as a rule) | habits, general truths, "we do it this way" |
| bet-patekh | bet- + present | he will open | plain future |
| patekhva | present + -va | he used to open | a habit that has stopped; a scene set in the past |
| beptakhele | progressive stem + copula | he is opening | right now, in front of you |
| beptakheva | progressive stem + past copula | he was opening | the background of a story |
| ptekhle | past stem + L | he opened | the workhorse. Anything finished |
| ptekhvale | past stem + -va + L | he had opened | an event further back than the one you are telling |
| ptikhele | resultative + copula | he has opened | it is done and the result stands now |
| ptikheva | resultative + past copula | it had been opened | the result as it stood back then |
| ptukh | bare stem | open! | commands |
| ave ptikha | ave + resultative | he may have opened | guessing about the past |
The two "had opened"s — this is the one that trips people
ptekhvale and ptikheva both come out as "had opened" in English, which is why they feel like the same tense. They are not, and Khan's own examples show the split cleanly:
- ptekhvale is the earlier EVENT. It is your plain past pushed one step further back, and it turns up mostly in a clause hanging off another one: bar-t mtivale, … "after it had ripened, …"; iman brezvalun, … "when they had dried, …". Something happened, then the thing you are actually telling happened.
- ptikheva is the standing RESULT. It describes how things were, because of something earlier: … lipeva "(since they) had learnt (from the missionaries), their houses were more beautiful"; ana lenva ktilu "but I had not killed him."
Rule of thumb: if you could say "by then, it was already _" you want ptikheva; if you are narrating one more event, further back, you want ptekhvale.
Don't drown in the past tenses — what actually matters
Assyrian has several past-ish forms that all sit close together, and Khan lists them all. You do not need to actively produce all of them. Start with the two on the left; treat the rest as things to recognize when you hear them.
| you want to say… | use | example |
|---|---|---|
| "I did it" (plain past) — your everyday past | past + L-ending | ptekhli "I opened" |
| "I'm doing it right now" | progressive | beptakheven "I'm opening" |
| "I have done it" (it's done, result matters) | perfect | ptikheven "I have opened" |
| "I used to do it" (old habit) | present + -va | patkhenva "I used to open" |
| "I had (already) done it" (before something else) | past + -va | ptekhvali "I had opened" |
The practical rule: for real conversation, lean on the plain past and the progressive. The perfect and the two -va forms are worth recognizing — you'll hear elders use them — but nobody will misunderstand you if you just say ptekhli "I opened." The fine shade between "I opened," "I have opened," and "I had opened" is one English blurs too; don't let it stall you.
---