3.2 The past copula — "was / were"
3 · The Copula — "am / is / are" (and "was / were") · a plain-language guide to Assyrian (Sureth) grammar
To move to the past, there's a matching set built on a -va ending:
| person | form | meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 1ms / 1fs | inva | I was |
| 2ms / 2fs | itva | you were |
| 2pl | itunva | you were |
| 3ms / 3fs / 3pl | iva | he / she / they was/were |
| 1pl | ikhva | we were |
Notice the past collapses some distinctions the present keeps: the singular "I was" (inva) and "you were" (itva) no longer split by gender, and one form iva covers he/she/they.
Fused onto lakhkha the same way:
| Assyrian | English |
|---|---|
| lakhkheva | he / she / they was here |
| lakhkhetva | you (m./f.) were here |
| lakhkhetunva | you (pl.) were here |
| lakhkhenva | I was here |
| lakhkhekhva | we were here |
So the move from present to past is basically "add -va": lakhkhele "he is here" → lakhkheva "he was here."
Go deeper
| Assyrian | English | from |
|---|---|---|
| bakhtu raba honanteva | his wife was very clever | A 3:57 |
| e-dana raba kribenva | then I was very angry | A 2:28 |
| khemmeva | it was hot | A 37:21 |
The copula said on its own, as iva, puts weight on the statement. Khan's example sets two facts side by side:
| Assyrian | English | from |
|---|---|---|
| tre-menne iva men-Urmi, kha-menne iva men-Maragha | two of them were from Urmi; one of them was from Maragha | B 1:2 |
---