hamzem

Learn Assyrian › Grammar

4B.6 *ptikhele* — the result, and the form for what you did not see

4B · Verbs in use — which form when · a plain-language guide to Assyrian (Sureth) grammar

Its main job is the one Chapter 4 gave it: a state now, arising from something earlier.

AssyrianEnglish
kullokhun lipotun darsokhun?have you all learnt your lesson?
shuddennet?have you gone mad?
lela bsheltait isn't cooked
lele telyahe isn't asleep
a dule lele mitalook, he isn't dead
ana iven khishaI have travelled

The part nobody tells you: it also marks hearsay

Assyrian has a quiet evidential system, and this is it. Khan calls it the indirective: the perfect can be used for a plain past event, and choosing it says "I did not witness this myself." It is what you use for a report, a rumour, or an inference.

Khan's own minimal pair makes it exact:

AssyrianEnglish
khoru mtile kam khamsha daykehis friend arrived five minutes ago (I saw it)
marele kat-khoru metyele kam khamsha dayke, akhchi ana len khezyuhe says his friend arrived five minutes ago, but I did not see him

Same event, same time, different form — and the difference is only who saw it. In a story, a narrator will switch mid-sentence between the two as he moves from what a character did to what he can only be inferring:

AssyrianEnglish
merre kat: khob ana tlili. tiyyele o-heyvan b-lele, khabusha khilule u-khishelehe said, "well, I went to sleep. That animal came at night, it ate the apple and went away"

tlili "I went to sleep" — witnessed, plain past. tiyyele … khilule … khishele — the rest, which he slept through, in the perfect.

It is not compulsory: a speaker can use the plain past for reported events too. But once you know it is there, a great deal of Assyrian storytelling stops sounding like a tense mistake.

---

‹ 4B.5 *beptakhele* — much more than "is doing"4B.7 The passive — *payesh* plus the resultative participle ›